MDGA22 Informational Only Testimony on HB482 Firearms – Right to Purchase, Own, Possess, and Carry – Medical Cannabis

ℹ️ HB482 Firearms – Right to Purchase, Own, Possess, and Carry – Medical Cannabis
Delegate Grammer
MSI is providing Informational Only Testimony on this bill.
Hearing scheduled for 3/9 at 1pm
Signup to testify between 3/7 between 8am and 3pm with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

cannabis pic small

The Bill: House Bill 482 adds a new subtitle 7 to the Public Safety Article relating to persons who are authorized to use medical cannabis under title 13, subtitle 33 of the Health – General Article of Maryland law. The bill provides that a State Agency may not access a State database relating to medical marijuana patients for the purpose of approving or disapproving such person’s application for a wear and carry permit, or for other purposes relating to the purchase, ownership, possession or carrying of a firearm. More generally, the bill provides that “IT IS THE INTENT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY THAT MEDICAL CANNABIS SHOULD BE TREATED AS LEGAL FOR PURPOSES OF STATE LAW AND THAT THE STATE SHOULD NOT PENALIZE A QUALIFYING PATIENT FOR USING THE DRUG LEGALLY. Like similar bills in the past, MSI takes no position with respect to the merits of these bills. However, as before, we do wish to point out some legal realities for purposes of informing the debate on these bills. A similar bill, SB 286, recently and unanimously passed the Senate. MSI likewise provided “information only” testimony on SB 286, making clear that the legal issues, identified below, also fully apply to SB 286.

Legal Issues: With the recent changes in Maryland law concerning medical marijuana, see MD Code, Health - General, § 13-3304 et seq., and the push to legalize the use of marijuana in Maryland, a recurring issue is how such marijuana use would affect Second Amendment rights. The short answer is that such use effectively abrogates those rights by (1) barring a Federal Firearms Licensee (“FFL”) from selling a firearm to such a user and (2), by making such a user a prohibited person under federal law.

House Judiciary Committee to Consider HB425 - YOUR VOICE IS NEEDED!

Request an unfavorable of HB425

The House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to consider HB425 Public Safety - Untraceable Firearms in a voting session starting at 1:30pm today (3/4/2021). We have a thorough analysis of the bill in our written testimony HERE. Briefly, existing owners have until the end of the year to have a federally licensed manufacturer (Type 07 FFL) inscribe any unserialized firearm that a person may possess. The same requirement applies to any unfinished frames or receivers one might have. No manufacturer is required to provide this service and manufacturers are free to charge any amount if they do. Failure to comply is punishable by up to three years imprisonment and a fine of up to $10,000 per gun (or receiver). Conviction of this "crime" is a lifetime disqualifier from ever possessing modern firearms or ammunition.

Contact the members of the committee directly to respectfully make your concerns with the bill known and to urge them for an unfavorable report. Their email addresses are below to copy and paste into your preferred email client. Be sure to have HB425 in your subject line.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The committee session will be viewable HERE at or shortly after 1:30pm.

For a primer on the legislative process, be sure to read our guide HERE.

 

MDGA22 Testimony in Support of HB1288 "Public Safety - Handgun Permit Application Fee - Waiver for Disabled Residents"

HB1288 Public Safety - Handgun Permit Application Fee - Waiver for Disabled Residents
Delegate Arikan, et al.
MSI SUPPORTS this bill!
Hearing scheduled for 3/2 at 1pm
Signup to testify between 2/28 between 8am and 3pm with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

Maryland State Police 006 small

The Bill: This bill would amend MD Code, Public Safety, § 5-304. That Section sets out fees charged by the State of Maryland in connection with an application for a wear and carry permit issued by the Maryland State Police for the wear, carry or transport of a handgun under MD Code, Public Safety, § 5-306. Those fees are “(i) $75 for an initial application; (ii) $50 for a renewal or subsequent application; and

(iii) $10 for a duplicate or modified permit”. See Section 5-304(b)(2). Subsection 5-304(d) provides that the Secretary of the State Police may not charge a fee otherwise imposed by Section 5-304 for “a State, county, or municipal public safety employee” who is required to carry a firearm as a condition of employment, or to a “retired law enforcement officer of the State or a county or municipal corporation of the State.”

The bill would add to that list A DISABLED PERSON, and would thus prohibit the Secretary from charging fees to a disabled person. For the sake of clarity, the bill also amends MD Code, Public Safety, § 5-301 to define a “disabled person” for these purposes, providing that a disabled person is a person who (1) HAS BEEN CERTIFIED AS DISABLED BY A UNIT OF THE STATE OR THE UNITED STATES THAT CLASSIFIES DISABLED INDIVIDUALS; AND (2) IS A RESIDENT OF THE STATE. The bill makes no modification to the requirements for a permit otherwise imposed by Section 5-306.

Discussion: This bill makes sense. People with disabilities are often uniquely susceptible to physical attack precisely because their disability may hinder or impede their ability to defend themselves. See https://bit.ly/3BVcvEI. As such, the State Police recognize that such individuals may well qualify for a wear and carry permit. Yet, such disabilities may also contribute to financial hardship. Persons should not be forced to choose between their need for self-defense and their ability to otherwise provide for themselves. The amounts involved are relatively small but may well be significant to a person with disabilities. Nothing in this bill would amend or change the rigorous training requirements otherwise imposed by Section 5-306(a)(5), including the requirement that the applicant demonstrate, through a scored course of live fire, “proficiency and use of the firearm.” See Section 306-5(a)(5)(ii). Nothing in the bill would change the requirement, imposed by Section 5-306(b)6), that the applicant demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the State Police, a “good and substantial reason” for the issuance of a carry permit. The only thing that would change is that the person with State-recognized disabilities would be spared the $75 initial application fee, the $50 renewal fee, and the $10 fee for a modified permit. That is a small price for the State to pay to assist such persons.

We urge a favorable report.

Sincerely,

Mark W. Pennak
President, Maryland Shall Issue, Inc.

MDGA22 Testimony in Opposition to SB873 and HB1396 "Public Safety – Firearm Industry Members – Public Nuisance"

❌ SB873 Public Safety – Firearm Industry Members – Public Nuisance
Senators Waldstreicher and Smith
Hearing Canceled


HB1396 Public Safety – Firearm Industry Members – Public Nuisance
Delegate Atterbeary
MSI OPPOSES this bill!
Hearing scheduled for 3/15 at 1pm
Signup to testify between 8am and 3pm on 3/11/2022 with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

uscongress louis velazquez XWW746i6WoM unsplash

The Bills: These bills define a new offense of “public nuisance” and is designed to negate the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7901, et seq. (“PLCAA”). It provides a new duty of care on a “firearm industry member” a term that is defined by the bill to include “A PERSON ENGAGED IN THE SALE, MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION, IMPORTING, OR MARKETING” of any “QUALIFIED PRODUCT,” a term that is defined to include all firearms and ammunition, including mere “COMPONENTS” of firearms and ammunition. The bills provide that such a “member” of the industry may not “knowingly or recklessly” engage in conduct that is “unlawful” or in conduct that “IS UNREASONABLE AND CREATES, MAINTAINS, OR CONTRIBUTES TO A CONDITION IN THE STATE THAT ENDANGERS THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC THROUGH THE SALE, MANUFACTURING, IMPORTING, OR MARKETING OF A QUALIFIED PRODUCT.” The bill also imposes a new duty on such industry members to “ESTABLISH AND USE REASONABLE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES TO PREVENT A QUALIFIED PRODUCT FROM BEING POSSESSED, USED, MARKETED, OR SOLD UNLAWFULLY IN THE STATE.”

The bill then declares that any violation of the foregoing provisions “THAT RESULTS IN HARM TO THE PUBLIC IS A PUBLIC NUISANCE.” The bill provides that the “CONDUCT” of the industry member SHALL CONSTITUTE A PROXIMATE CAUSE OF THE PUBLIC NUISANCE IF THE ENDANGERMENT OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC WAS A REASONABLY FORESEEABLE EFFECT OF THE CONDUCT, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY INTERVENING ACTIONS, INCLUDING CRIMINAL ACTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES.” The bill then provides for enforcement of the bill’s provisions by the Attorney General if the Attorney General “SUSPECTS” a violation or imminent violation, providing that “IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN ORDER OF THE COURT OF APPEALS, IMPOUND AND RETAIN” records of the industry member. The bill also provides for lawsuits, stating IF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DETERMINES THAT THERE HAS BEEN A VIOLATION UNDER THIS SUBTITLE, THE FOLLOWING PARTIES MAY BRING AN ACTION AGAINST THE FIREARM INDUSTRY MEMBER FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF OR TO RECOVER FOR DAMAGES, OR BOTH, IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OR IN A FEDERAL COURT SITTING IN THE STATE.” The list of persons entitled to bring suit “IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OR IN A FEDERAL COURT,” includes the Attorney General, city corporate counsel and “A PERSON THAT SUFFERED DAMAGE AS A RESULT OF THE VIOLATION.” The bill authorizes compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and costs and “OTHER RELIEF THE COURT CONSIDERS PROPER.”

MDGA22 Testimony in Opposition to HB1021 "Public Safety – Licensed Firearms Dealers – Security Requirements"

❌ HB1021 Public Safety – Licensed Firearms Dealers – Security Requirements
Speaker Jones
MSI OPPOSES this bill!
Hearing scheduled for 3/2 at 1pm
Signup to testify between 2/28 between 8am and 3pm with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

gunshoprack

The Bill:

The bill would create a new Section 5-145.1 in the Public Safety Article of the Maryland Code that would impose new security requirements on licensed dealers in Maryland.  Specifically, the bill provides that a dealer MAY NOT CONDUCT BUSINESS AND STORE FIREARMS AT A LOCATION UNLESS the premises on which the dealer operates is EQUIPPED WITH . . . (1) EQUIPMENT CAPABLE OF FILMING AND RECORDING VIDEO FOOTAGE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE BUILDINGS WHERE FIREARMS ARE STORED; (2) BARS OR SECURITY SCREENS DESIGNED TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY ON ALL EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS OF ALL BUILDINGS WHERE FIREARMS ARE STORED; (3) A BURGLARY ALARM SYSTEM THAT IS CONTINUALLY MONITORED; AND (4) PHYSICAL BARRIERS DESIGNED TO PREVENT THE USE OF MOTOR VEHICLES TO BREACH ALL BUILDINGS WHERE FIREARMS ARE STORED. The bill then provides that, outside of business hours, the dealer must LOCK[] ALL FIREARMS STORED ON THE PREMISES IN: (I) A VAULT; (II) A SAFE; OR (III) A SECURE ROOM.

The bill imposes a civil penalty of $1,000 for the first violation.  For a second and subsequent violations, the bill imposes a criminal penalty of 3 years imprisonment and/or a fine of $10,000 if the offense was COMMITTED KNOWINGLY AND WILLFULLY. This criminal penalty effectively renders the dealer a disqualified person under both federal and state law, thereby ending the ability of the dealer to possess any firearm or modern ammunition for life. See 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(20)(B), MD Code, Public Safety, § 5-101(g)(3). The ability of the dealer to make a living as a dealer is thus destroyed upon indictment, 18 U.S.C. 922(n), and/or conviction, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), for this offense.

Gun Bills Being Heard Soon in the General Assembly!

State House Dome
 
All of these upcoming gun bills need your voice! Don't sit on the sidelines. 

Being heard Virtually on March 2nd at 1pm in the Judiciary Committee:
Testimony signup and submission is 2/28 between 8am and 3pm.
Go directly to the MyMGA Witness Signup page here: https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/MyMGATracking/WitnessSignup

HB1288 Public Safety - Handgun Permit Application Fee - Waiver for Disabled Residents
Delegate Arikan, et al.

As the name implies, this bill would waive application fees for applicants of carry permits for Maryland residents with disabilities. Read our full testimony HERE. MSI SUPPORTS this bill and requests a favorable report.

HB1021 Public Safety – Licensed Firearms Dealers – Security Requirements
Speaker Jones

This bill imposes strict and very expensive storage, security, and other requirements upon federal firearms licensees across the state, even for those who hold FFL03 Curio and Relics licenses! If enacted, HB1021 would likely force many firearms dealers to close or leave the state, thus making it that much harder for Marylanders to purchase firearms and thus exercise their Second Amendment rights. Read our full testimony HERE. MSI OPPOSES this bill and requests an unfavorable report.

Being heard In-Person March 2nd at 1pm in the Judicial Proceedings Committee:

Testimony signup and submission is TOMORROW (3/1) starting at 4pm until 10am on 3/2.

SB873 Public Safety – Firearm Industry Members – Public Nuisance
Senators Waldstreicher and Smith

SB873 is designed to make it easy to bring suit against FFLs and other firearms industry members for harms caused by misuse of a firearm by a purchaser or by third parties. The bill thus attempts to usurp the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which was enacted by Congress to preempt and put a stop to the very types of lawsuits the bill would allow. Read our full testimony HERE. MSI OPPOSES this bill and requests an unfavorable report.


Being heard Virtually on March 9th at 1pm in the Judiciary Committee:

Testimony signup and submission is on 3/7 between 8am and 3pm.

HB871 Handgun Permit - Preliminary Approval
Delegate Saab, et al.

HB871 would have the State Police investigate a carry permit applicant before requiring they complete the necessary training. Upon approval, the applicant would have 120 days to complete the training before being given the permit. The Senate cross-file to this bill, SB338, was heard on 2/16 and passed the Senate unanimously this week. Read our full testimony HERE. MSI SUPPORTS this bill and requests a favorable report.

HB1174 Public Safety – Permit to Carry, Wear, or Transport a Handgun – Qualifications
Delegate Kipke, et al.

This bill would effectively make Maryland shall issue for carry permits like the vast majority of the country. The Senate version of the bill, SB327, was recently heard and you can see that proceeding HERE. Read our full testimony HERE. MSI SUPPORTS this bill and requests a favorable report.

HB1206 Public Safety – Handgun Permit Requirement – Repeal (Maryland’s Constitutional Carry Act of 2022)
Delegate Grammer

You read the title correctly; this bill if enacted would line Maryland up with the 21 states (and likely more soon) that currently do not require permits to carry handguns in public. MSI SUPPORTS this bill and requests a favorable report.

ℹ️ HB482 Firearms – Right to Purchase, Own, Possess, and Carry – Medical Cannabis
Delegate Grammer

This bill is similar in effect to Senator Hough's SB286. It would disallow the State Police from denying an HQL, carry permit, or firearms purchase based on one's possession of a medical cannabis card and use of medical cannabis. MSI is submitting Informational testimony only on this bill, as the use of cannabis in any regard bars a person from any possession of a firearm or modern ammunition. 


Being heard Virtually on March 10th at 1pm in the Appropriations Committee:
Testimony signup and submission is on 3/8 between 8am and 3pm.

HB780 Gun-Free Higher Education Zones
Delegate Jalisi

HB780 is a blast from the past as this bill resurrects prior attempts dating back to 2017 that would have banned firearms completely from the grounds of all public institutions of higher education. It was a bad idea then and it still is now. Here's MSI's oral testimony on a similar bill from 2017. MSI OPPOSES this bill and requests an unfavorable report.


Being heard In-Person March 15th at 1pm in the Judicial Proceedings Committee:

Testimony signup and submission is between 4pm on 3/14 and 10am on 3/15.

SB676 Firearm Safety - Storage Requirements and Youth Suicide Prevention (Jaelynn's Law)
Senators Smith and Beidle

The House cross file of this bill, HB659, was heard last week in Judiciary and that hearing is worth watching to understand the trouble with further criminalizing how gun owners store their firearms and ammunition. Read our full testimony HERE. MSI Opposes this bill and requests an unfavorable report.

SB773 Public Safety – Firearms Dealers – Storage Vaults for Regulated Firearms
Senator Carter

Though not as expansive in scope as HB1021, SB773 would require dealers to install vaults for all regulated firearms to be stored in as a condition of being able to sell firearms in Maryland. MSI OPPOSES this bill and requests an unfavorable report.
 

MDGA22 Testimony in Support of of HB1174 and SB327 "Public Safety – Permit to Carry, Wear, or Transport a Handgun – Qualifications"

✅ HB1174 Public Safety – Permit to Carry, Wear, or Transport a Handgun – Qualifications
Delegate Nick Kipke, et al.
MSI SUPPORTS this bill!
Hearing scheduled for 3/9 at 1pm
Signup to testify between 3/7 between 8am and 3pm with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

✅ SB327 Public Safety – Permit to Carry, Wear, or Transport a Handgun – Qualifications
Senator Justin Ready, et al.
MSI SUPPORTS this bill!
Heard on 2/10 - Watch HERE

breadcrumbs bg

The Bills

These bills would amend MD Code, Public Safety, § 5-306(b)(6)(ii) to specify that “self-protection,” or “self-defense” is a basis for finding a “good and substantial” reason for the issuance of a Maryland Wear and Carry Permit. The bills leave unaltered the rest of Section 5-306, including leaving unchanged the rigorous training requirements of 16 hours of instruction that includes a live fire component that “demonstrates the applicant’s proficiency and use of the firearm.” Also unchanged is the requirement that the State Police conduct a background investigation using the applicant’s fingerprints, and the requirement that the State Police find that the applicant “has not exhibited a propensity for violence or instability that may reasonably render the person’s possession of a handgun a danger to the person or to another,” found at § 5-306(b)(6)(ii).

Stated briefly, there are powerful reasons to enact this bill into law. Section 5-306, as administered by the State Police, is unconstitutional without these amendments. The Maryland requirement of a “good and substantial reason” is on borrowed time in the courts, including in a pending case challenging Maryland’s law. Should Maryland lose in such litigation, the attorneys’ fees award against Maryland under 42 U.S.C. §1988, will prove quite expensive. Moreover, as John Hopkins University’s most recent study (attached) documents, illegal carry by otherwise law-abiding citizens for self-defense is very common in Baltimore. These individuals should be accorded an opportunity to carry legally, so as to obtain the training and legal instruction presently mandated by Maryland law. The amendments to Maryland’s law in this bill would make that possible. As explained below, the status quo in Baltimore is utterly untenable.

MDGA22 - Testimony in Opposition to HB659/SB676 - "Firearm Safety - Storage Requirements and Youth Suicide Prevention (Jaelynn's Law)"

❌ HB659 - Firearm Safety - Storage Requirements and Youth Suicide Prevention (Jaelynn's Law)
Delegate Dana Stein
MSI OPPOSES this bill!
Virtual hearing scheduled for 2/23 at 1pm
Signup to testify between 2/21 between 8am and 3pm with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

❌ SB676 Firearm Safety - Storage Requirements and Youth Suicide Prevention (Jaelynn's Law)
Senators Smith and Beidle
MSI OPPOSES this bill!
In-person hearing scheduled for 3/15 at 1pm
Signup to testify between 3/14 at 4pm and and 3/15 by 10am with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

thomas tucker A2k ziO T9U unsplash

The Bills:

The bills would amend MD Code Criminal Law § 4-104. Specifically, current law provides that “[a] person may not store or leave a loaded firearm in a location where the person knew or should have known that an unsupervised child would gain access to the firearm.” A child is defined for these purposes as a person “under the age of 16 years.” These bills would change the definition of a child to any minor (a person under the age of 18 years). The bills then provide that a person may not store or leave any firearm, loaded or unloaded, in a location where a person knew or reasonably should have known that an unsupervised MINOR IS LIKELY TO gain access to the firearm.

The bills then create three categories of prohibitions concerning such access. The first is simply that A PERSON MAY NOT STORE OR LEAVE A FIREARM IN A LOCATION WHERE THE PERSON KNEW OR REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT AN UNSUPERVISED MINOR IS LIKELY TO GAIN ACCESS TO THE FIREARM, but the minor does not actually gain access. Such storage is punishable with 90 days in prison or a fine of $1,000 or both. The second category is where such storage occurs and AN UNSUPERVISED MINOR DOES GAIN ACCESS TO THE FIREARM. Such storage is punishable by imprisonment by up to 2 years and a $2,500 fine or both. The third category is that the firearm is left WHERE THE PERSON KNEW OR REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT AN UNSUPERVISED MINOR IS LIKELY TO GAIN ACCESS and the minor’s access RESULTS IN HARM TO THE MINOR OR TO ANOTHER PERSON. Such storage is punishable by up to 3 years imprisonment and a fine of $5,000.

The bills also create a number of “safe harbors” for certain conduct or storage which are exempt from the bills’ prohibitions. Specifically, the bills retain current law exemptions for when minor access is supervised by a person 18 or older and where the minor’s access is the result of unlawful entry. The bills add an exemption for firearms that are stored UNLOADED, and the ammunition for such firearm is IN A SECURE LOCATION WHERE A MINOR IS NOT LIKELY TO GAIN ACCESS TO THE AMMUNITION and THE FIREARM: 1. SECURED IN A LOCKED CONTAINER THAT IS EQUIPPED WITH A TAMPER-RESISTANT LOCK; OR 2. RENDERED INOPERABLE TO ANYONE OTHER THAN AN AUTHORIZED ADULT. The bill also retains the existing law’s exemption for a minor who has a certificate of firearm and hunter safety issued by the State, but restricts that access solely to a rifle or shotgun and adds the caveat that the minor must have BEEN GIVEN EXPRESS PERMISSION BY THE MINOR’S PARENT OR GUARDIAN TO ACCESS THE RIFLE OR SHOTGUN FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENGAGING IN A LAWFUL ACTIVITY. 

MDGA22 - Testimony in Support of HB590 - "Handgun Permit Holders – Authority to Carry Handguns in State Parks and Forests"

✅ HB590 - Handgun Permit Holders – Authority to Carry Handguns in State Parks and Forests
Delegate Daniel Cox
MSI SUPPORTS this bill!
Virtual hearing scheduled for 2/23 at 1pm
Signup to testify between 2/21 between 8am and 3pm with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

brayden winemiller I2N8tXEbeNU unsplash

The Bill and the Existing Legal Framework: This bill provides that the Department of Natural Resources may not prohibit an individual to whom a handgun permit has been issued by the State Police under MD Code, Public Safety, § 5-306, from wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun in a State park or forest, subject to any limitations attached to such a permit by the State Police under MD Code, Public Safety, § 5-307. Under current regulations, the Department has broadly banned possession of firearms in these locations, without regard to whether a person has been issued a permit by the State Police. See COMAR § 08.01.07.14 (relating to Chesapeake Forest Lands); COMAR § 08.07.01.04 (relating to State forests); COMAR § 08.07.06.04 (relating to State parks). This bill would allow persons with carry permits (and only such persons) to possess and carry a firearm in these locations, just as such persons are entrusted by the State Police to possess and carry a loaded firearm in other public areas throughout the State.

As amended by the Firearms Safety Act of 2013, MD Code, Public Safety, § 5-306(b)(6), allows the State Police to issue a carry permit upon a showing that the applicant for the permit has demonstrated a “good and substantial reason” to carry a firearm in public. Such a good cause requirement is sometimes known as a “may issue” requirement, as a particularized showing of need is required. Section 5-306 also imposes rigorous training requirements of 16 hours of instruction that includes a live fire component that “demonstrates the applicant’s proficiency and use of the firearm.” Section 5-306(b)(6) requires that the State Police conduct a background investigation using the applicant’s fingerprints, and that the State Police find that the applicant “has not exhibited a propensity for violence or instability that may reasonably render the person’s possession of a handgun a danger to the person or to another.” Another Maryland statute, MD Code, Public Safety, § 5-307, allows the State Police to attach time, place and manner restrictions on any carry permit issued under Section 5-306.

MDGA22 - Testimony in Support of SB456 - "Firearms - Handgun Qualification License - Firearms Orientation Component"

✅ SB456 Firearms - Handgun Qualification License - Firearms Orientation Component
Senator Jack Bailey
MSI SUPPORTS this bill!
Hearing scheduled for 2/16 at 1pm
Signup to testify between 2/15 at 4pm and and 2/16 by 10am with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

HandgunWithMSIFlag

The HQL Statute and the Bill

This bill would amend MD Code, Public Safety, 5-117.1 (HQL statute).  That Section prohibits law-abiding, responsible Maryland citizens from acquiring a handgun unless they have a Handgun Qualification License (“HQL”). Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety, § 5-117.1(c).  Subsection (d) imposes training requirements, including a (i) a minimum of 4 hours of instruction by a qualified handgun instructor” consisting of “(ii) classroom instruction on: 1. State firearm law; 2. home firearm safety; 3. handgun mechanisms and operation; and (iii) a firearms orientation component that demonstrates the person’s safe operation and handling of a firearm.”  In regulations, the Maryland State Police have added a new and additional live-fire training requirement, mandating that the HQL applicant “safely fires at least one round of live ammunition.”  COMAR 29.03.01.29(C)(4). That live round requirement is not found in the statute. 

The bill would allow instructors to use live fire in teaching the HQL class, providing that the class “MAY INCLUDE THE USE OF LIVE OR INERT AMMUNITION.”  Instructors do this now as HQL instruction is sometimes combined with instruction for the much longer (8 hours) NRA Basic Pistol course, in which live fire is a substantial part. The bill, however, goes on to provide that live fire is not required in order to satisfy the training requirement, stating that “A PERSON MAY NOT BE REQUIRED TO FIRE ROUNDS OF LIVE AMMUNITION AS PART OF THE FIREARMS ORIENTATION COMPONENT UNDER PARAGRAPH (1)(III)3 OF THIS SUBSECTION.” As explained below, this provision is fully consistent with the language and legislative history of the HQL legislation and will broaden the availability of basic firearms training to underserved portions of the Maryland community which have be unable to obtain training because of the live fire requirement.

MDGA22 - Testimony in Support of SB533 - "Criminal Law - Theft of a Handgun"

✅ SB533 - Criminal Law - Theft of a Handgun
Senator Justin Ready
MSI is providing Informational Testimony only
Hearing scheduled for 2/16 at 1pm
Signup to testify between 2/15 at 4pm and and 2/16 by 10am with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

boltcutters michael dziedzic pM9pkc9J918 unsplash
Photo by Michael Dziedzic on Unsplash

The Bill

The purpose of this bill is to provide for greatly enhanced penalties for the theft of a firearm. Under current law, theft of a firearm is treated just like the theft of any other piece of personal property. For example, under MD Code Criminal Law § 7-104(g)(2), “a person convicted of theft of property or services with a value of at least $100 but less than $1,500, is guilty of a misdemeanor and: (i) is subject to: 1. for a first conviction, imprisonment not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding $500 or both; and 2. for a second or subsequent conviction, imprisonment not exceeding 1 year or a fine not exceeding $500 or both. The bill would change these penalties for theft of a firearm to a felony and would impose, on the first offense, a term of imprisonment not exceeding 5 years and/or a fine of $1,000. Subsequent offenses are punishable by imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years and/or a fine not exceeding $2,500. These punishments are similar to the provisions enacted in 2020 by the Senate in SB 35 which likewise made theft of a firearm a felony and punished such theft with imprisonment for up to 5 years and a fine of $10,000. SB 35 further required the thief to restore the firearm to the owner or pay the owner the value of the firearm.

MDGA22 - Testimony in Opposition to HB425 and SB387 "Public Safety - Untraceable Firearms"

House Bill 425 is being heard on 2/9 in a virtual-only (Zoom) hearing starting at 1 pm.
Sign up for this hearing starts on 2/7 at 8 am and ends at 3 pm. Sign-up is done with your MyMGA account.

Senate Bill 387 is being heard on 2/16 in-person in a hearing starting at 1 pm in the Senate Judicial Proceedings room. Sign-up starts on 2/15 at 4 pm and ends the morning of the hearing at 10 am. Sign-up is best done with your MyMGA account.

Check out our guide on submitting bill testimony HERE: https://www.marylandshallissue.org/jmain/legislation-tracker/166-tips-testimony-mga

The Bills and Framework of State and Federal Law

The bills would create a massive new gun ban on the possession, receipt, sale, transfer or purchase of un-serialized unfinished receivers and frames. First, the bills provide that “person may not purchase, receive, sell, offer to sell, or transfer an unfinished frame or receiver unless it is required by federal law to be, and has been, imprinted with a serial number by a federally licensed firearms manufacturer or federally licensed firearms importer in compliance with all federal laws and regulations applicable to the manufacture and import of firearms.” This ban would go into effect on June 1, 2022. Next, the bills ban mere possession of an unserialized, privately made firearm on or after January 1, 2023. To be lawfully kept after January 1, 2023, all unfinished frames and receivers would have to be serialized as the bills describe. The mere possession of any unserialized item considered to be a firearm is a criminal offense as of 1/1/2023.

The bills create a very broad and new definition of "firearm" to make clear that unfinished receivers will now be considered to be a “firearm.” Specifically, the bills define "unfinished frame or receiver" to mean "a forged, cast, printed, extruded, or machined body or similar article that (1) Has reached a stage in manufacture where it may readily be completed, assembled, or converted to be used as the frame or receiver of a functional firearm; or (2) Is marketed or sold to the public to become or be used as the frame or receiver of a functional firearm once completed, assembled, or converted." In this respect, the bills go far beyond the definition of a firearm set forth in federal law. Under federal law, 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(3), a firearm is defined as “(A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon; (C) any firearm muffler or firearm silencer; or (D) any destructive device. Such term does not include an antique firearm.”

MDGA22 - Testimony in Support of SB338 "Handgun Permit - Preliminary Approval"

✅ SB338 - Handgun Permit - Preliminary Approval
Senator Michael Hough
MSI is providing Informational Testimony only
Hearing scheduled for 2/8 at 1pm
Signup to testify on 2/4 between 10am and 3pm with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

 Maryland State Police 006 small

The Firearms Safety Act of 2013 requires that a person complete a 16 hour training course, taught by a State certified instructor, “prior to application” for a carry permit. MD Code, Public Safety, § 5-306(a)(5). Senate Bill 338 would amend Section 5-306 to delete the requirement that the training be completed “prior to application.” It then provides that a person may file an initial application for a wear and carry permit without completing the training and directs that the State Police to issue a preliminary approval if the person is otherwise qualified for the permit. The person then has 120 days after receipt of the preliminary approval to furnish the State Police the certificate of training otherwise required by the regulations. A permit does not issue until that training certificate is provided.  If no certificate of training is provided, the State Police are directed to revoke the preliminary approval and deny the permit application.

This bill makes sense.  Indeed, this same bill passed the House of Delegates in 2017 as HB 1036 and that bill was reported out this Committee with a favorable report. The bill only failed to become law that year because time ran out at sine die. In 2020, the same bill (SB 506) was favorably reported out by this Committee and unanimously passed the Senate, only to die in the House with the shortened legislative session due to COVID 19. Last Session, this same preliminary approval legislation (SB 309) was passed by the Senate, but died in the House. This bill, SB 338, is not materially different than these bills that have passed the Senate and the House in years past. 

To be clear, the existing, very rigorous training requirements are not relaxed in the slightest under this bill and no permit may be issued without a person satisfying those requirements. That training, however, is relatively hard to find and can be quite expensive, running from around $300 up to $600 for each person in a class. This high cost reflects the number of hours required and the mandatory live-fire course mandated by the State Police.  That live-fire requirement necessitates access to a range, which are relatively few in number in Maryland and most commonly privately owned and operated.  Many, if not most, instructors require a minimum number of persons in a class, typically ten, and classes are not held until that minimum number of persons actually sign up for the class. For these reasons, a person will need at least 120 days to find the course and secure training. This bill allows a person to apply without undergoing that initial and substantial expense, which would be completely wasted if the State Police were to determine that the person is not otherwise qualified for the permit.

Other jurisdictions follow this same approach.  For example, California imposes a “good cause” requirement for a carry permit. See CA Penal Code 26202. That “good cause” requirement is quite similar to the Maryland “good and substantial reason” requirement imposed by MD Code Public Safety §5-306(a)(6)(ii).  California, like Maryland, likewise imposes a 16 hour training requirement.  CA Penal Code § 26165.  Yet, that same provision also provides that “[t]he applicant shall not be required to pay for any training courses prior to the determination of good cause being made pursuant to Section 26202.”  See also Section 26202 (“If the licensing authority determines that good cause exists, the notice shall inform the applicants to proceed with the training requirements specified in Section 26165.”).

2022 General Assembly Week Three Update

So-Called "Ghost Guns."  Two New Bills:

The two identical bills that would criminalize the possession of any unserialized firearms in Maryland have been scheduled for separate hearings in the House and Senate. Your testimony against them could mean the difference between incarcerating innocent Marylanders and being able to legally keep arms you've always had the right to have. If they are going to be stopped or amended, YOUR TESTIMONY is needed.

House Bill 425 is being heard on 2/9 in a virtual-only (Zoom) hearing starting at 1 pm.
Sign up for this hearing starts on 2/7 at 8 am and ends at 3 pm. Sign-up is done with your MyMGA account.

Senate Bill 387 is being heard on 2/16 in-person in a hearing starting at 1 pm in the Senate Judicial Proceedings room. Sign-up starts on 2/15 at 4 pm and ends the morning of the hearing at 10 am. Sign-up is best done with your MyMGA account.

The only way to guarantee that your input on the bill is received is to submit written testimony. You can, and should, signup to provide oral testimony too, but the committees are free to set time limits and be very selective in who gets to speak. Read more in our guide on how this all works here: https://www.marylandshallissue.org/jmain/legislation-tracker/166-tips-testimony-mga

We have a Frequently Asked Questions page about what these bills do and don't do HERE.

Find all of the bills submitted so far and how to testify with our Tracker at: tinyurl.com/mdgunbills

2022 General Assembly Week Two Update

While the bill text is not yet available as of this writing, there is a lot of talk about bills that would ban, that’s right, ban, unserialized privately made firearms in Maryland. Attorney General Brian Frosh hosted a press conference where he was joined by Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott, BPD Commissioner Michael Harris, Senators Susan Lee and Will Smith, Delegates Lesley Lopez and Luke Clippinger, and members of law enforcement from Prince Georges and Montgomery Counties.

Frosh announced that the bills, if enacted, would redefine “unfinished frame and receiver” and “firearm” to match the proposed ATF rules on what constitutes a firearm. He also announced that unfinished frames and receivers would no longer be legally acquired in Maryland on June 1, 2022, and current owners would have to have a federally licensed dealer inscribe a serial number on any they have by January 1, 2023, or face up to three years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

In Memoriam: Henry Heymering, Founder of Maryland Shall Issue

It is with heavy hearts that we announce the passing of our Founder, Henry Heymering on January 19th, 2022 at 71. Henry founded Maryland Shall Issue in 2004 with the aim of taking a different approach to pro-2nd Amendment and self-defense advocacy by focusing on non-partisan outreach and education. During his time as president, MSI became one of the regular entities in Annapolis working to protect the interests of gun owners. MSI helped to fend off earlier attempts at banning the possession of common semi-automatic rifles and handguns, taxes on ammunition, and hosts of other attempts at criminalizing or further burdening gun ownership. MSI had also pushed for a Maryland constitutional amendment recognizing the right to keep and bear arms and bills that would allow citizens to apply for permits to carry a handgun in public without needing a "good and substantial reason," hence our name. Toward the end of his presidency, he also signed MSI on as amicus in a brief in support of the landmark, District of Columbia v. Heller. His chronology on Maryland's carry laws is often cited in our testimony and that of other advocates.

Long before he founded MSI, Henry was a life-long horseback rider and became a farrier (one who shoes horses) as a teenager. His interest and work led him to create the American Farriers Journal in 1975 and he'd go on to become a world-renowned authority in the field. When he wasn't caring for and enjoying the company of horses, he was also a musician and cowboy action shooter.

MSI's all-volunteer tradition of advocating before lawmakers, in courtrooms, and most importantly, the people, are all thanks to Henry. His legacy will be carried on and continues through our work to finally make Maryland shall issue.

UPCOMING SERVICE
Apr, 9 2022
12:00p.m.
Utica Park Pavilion 1
Frederick, Maryland

https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/fredericknewspost/name/henry-heymering-obituary?id=32585548

 

 Maryland Shall Issue org logoAn early MSI logo.

The 2022 Legislative Session has Begun

The Maryland General Assembly opened the 2022 Legislative Session Wednesday and there are already a small handful of gun bills. Testimony will begin this coming week with HB30, a bill aimed at banning guns in polling sites or within 100 feet of such sites. That bill is scheduled to be heard 1/19 at 1:00pm at the House Ways and Means Committee. More details on that bill and how to testify are below in the next section.

Like prior years, there will be bills introduced to criminalize or otherwise restrict the possession and creation of privately made firearms. This is a top priority of Attorney General Brian Frosh, who is working with Delegate Lopez and Senator Lee. Our president, Mark Pennak, was quoted in The Maryland Daily Record about our opposition to the bills. The language of those bills is not yet available as of this writing, but we will of course track it and make you aware as soon as it is filed.

Expect to see more updates like this one as we get further into session and if the right to keep and bear arms is to be protected in Maryland, it is of utmost importance to keep engaged, educate others, speak with your lawmakers, and of course, testify.

Joining helps MSI promote these rights and ensures that we're able to continue our advocacy.

MDGA22 - MSI Testimony in Opposition to HB30 and SB329 - "Polling Sites - Firearms Prohibitions"

❌ HB30 - Election Law – Polling Sites – Firearms Prohibitions
Delegate Shaneka Henson
MSI OPPOSES this bill!
Hearing held on 1/19

❌ SB329 - Election Law – Polling Sites – Firearms Prohibitions
Senators Jeff Waldstreicher and Bill Ferguson
Being heard at 2/23 at 1pm

ballot black and white black and white container

The bill(s), as originally submitted, was a carbon copy of SB 10 from the 2021 General Assembly Session as it was amended and passed by the Senate. That bill never emerged from the House Ways and Means Committee after a hearing. Like SB 10, HB 30 would amend MD Code, Election Law, §16-904, to provide that a person may not “CARRY OR POSSESS A FIREARM WITHIN 100 FEET OF A POLLING SITE DURING AN ELECTION.” Second, the bill provides that a person may not “CARRY OR DISPLAY A FIREARM ON THE PREMISES OF A PRIVATELY OR PUBLICLY OWNED BUILDING BEING USED AS A POLLING SITE DURING AN ELECTION, INCLUDING IN A PARKING LOT.” A violation of the Bill is punished as a civil infraction under which a $5,000 fine may be assessed against the violator under MD Code, Election Law, § 13-604. That fine may be imposed even though the person commits a violation “without knowing that the act is illegal.” MD Code, Election Law, § 13-604(a). The bill thus imposes strict liability for otherwise innocent conduct without regard to the person’s knowledge of the law or the person’s intent.

MDGA22 - Informational Only Testimony from MSI on SB286 - Firearms - Use of Medical Cannabis

ℹ️ SB286 - Firearms - Use of Medical Cannabis
Senator Michael Hough
MSI is providing Informational Testimony only
Hearing scheduled for 2/8 at 1pm
Signup to testify on 2/4 between 8am and 3pm with your MyMGA Account
For more on how to testify and signup, read our guide.

February 8, 2022

Senate Bill 286 provides that “a person may not be denied the right to purchase, possess, or carry a firearm under this title solely on the basis that the person” is authorized to use medical cannabis under title 13, subtitle 33 of the Health – General Article of Maryland law. Like similar bills in the past, MSI takes no position with respect to the merits of these bills. However, as before, we do wish to point out some legal realities for purposes of informing the debate on these bills.

With the recent changes in Maryland law concerning medical marijuana, see MD Code, Health - General, § 13-3304 et seq., and the push to legalize the use of marijuana in Maryland, a recurring issue is how such marijuana use would affect Second Amendment rights. The short answer is that such use effectively abrogates those rights by (1) barring a Federal Firearms Licensee (“FFL”) from selling a firearm to such a user and (2), by making such a user a prohibited person under federal law.

December Update

Get Ready for the 2022 Legislative Session

Now more than ever, it's critical that supporters of the Second Amendment make their positions known before our lawmakers. Testimony for this legislative session continues to be conducted virtually via Zoom. While this may blunt the emotional impact of in-person testimony, it also provides an opportunity for more citizens to have their voices heard in Annapolis. If you have a quiet space and a good internet connection, you too can make an impact. To prepare your testimony, use our helpful guide to navigate the process. Included are key tips to make your oral and written testimony impactful and strong.

Our '22 Gun Bill Tracker is up and running to keep you up to date throughout the legislative session. The first pre-filed bills (those filed ahead of session) will be made available to be posted soon. Gun Bill updates are added to the tracker including MSI's testimony, how lawmakers vote, and how to contact them.

Latest News

MSI Bill Tracker - 2024 Maryland General Assembly Regular Session

2023 Gun Bill Tracker Graphic

This tracker follows legislation and lawmakers in the Maryland General Assembly. It serves as an easily searchable gun and self-defense-related bill database for supporters of the right to keep and bear arms.

 

For a simpler view of bills MSI has taken a position on, please see the supplementary table below.

Share this tracker anywhere! tinyurl.com/guntracker
Key:
Red ❌= Oppose
Green ✅= Support
Light Green ✅= Support with Amendment
Blue ℹ️= Informational Testimony Only (provides knowledge for the committee on the bill without taking a position)
Gray = Position Pending or None Taken

Drop this link in your preferred calendar app to subscribe to live updates from the tracker https://bit.ly/3Z67kMq

HOW TO TESTIFY
MSI Guide - Tips For Your Testimony in the Maryland General Assembly

To Sign-up to testify, you MUST make a MyMGA Account!
DO SO HERE


Should you talk to your lawmakers about issues that affect your right to keep and bear arms for self-defense? Absolutely!
Use these links to find the State lawmakers who represent you in the General Assembly and how to contact them. 

Always be civil and speak on how a bill or bills directly affect you.

  1. Emails are ok.
  2. Phone calls are better.
  3. Visits are the best.

Find your representatives HERE
Committee Contacts can be found HERE

 

 

(Tutorial videos sourced from the MGA Website)

House of Delegates Protocols

Senate Witness Guidelines

Sign-up for testimony HERE

Remote testimony is conducted via Zoom. Download it here.

All Committee Testimony Guidelines HERE

Maryland General Assembly YouTube Pages:
Main Page
Senate
Senate Judicial Proceedings
House
House Judiciary
Channel 1
Channel 2
Channel 3
Channel 4

Share our tracker with this link:
https://tinyurl.com/guntracker


Maryland Shall Issue® (MSI) is an all-volunteer, non-partisan organization dedicated to the preservation and advancement of gun owners' rights in Maryland. It seeks to educate the community about the right of self-protection, the safe handling of firearms, and the responsibility that goes with carrying a firearm in public. MSI is recognized by the IRS as a tax-exempt 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization.

Join Us! 

 

 

Contact Info

Mailing Address:

Maryland Shall Issue®, Inc.
9613 Harford Rd
Ste C #1015
Baltimore, MD 21234-2150

NOTE: Please use  to contact us as we are not always able to answer voice messages.

Phone:  410-849-9197
Email: 
Web:   www.marylandshallissue.org