MSI v. Montgomery County (MoCo Cir.Ct.) - Defendant's Reply To Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Enactment Of Senate Bill 387 And House Bill 425 Into LawHOT
MSI v. Montgomery County (MoCo Cir.Ct.) - Plaintiffs’ Motion To Exceed Page Limitation On Memorandum In Response To Defendant’s Submission Concerning HB 425 And SB 387HOT
MSI et al. v. Anne Arundel County (US Dist. Ct, MD) - Corrected Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for DiscoveryHOT
MSI et al. v. Anne Arundel County (US Dist. Ct, MD) - Defendant’s Response To Motion For Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, and Request for the Court to Set Scheduling OrderHOT
MSI et al. v. Anne Arundel County (US Dist. Ct, MD) - Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order, or, in the Alternative, for Summary JudgmentHOT
MSI et al. v. Anne Arundel County (US Dist. Ct, MD) - Memorandum In Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order and in Support of Plaintiffs’ Alternative HOT
MSI v. Montgomery County (MoCo Cir.Ct.) - Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Enactment of Senate Bill 387 and House Bill 425 Into Law and Motion for Expedited Hearing and DecisionHOT
MSI et al. v. Anne Arundel County (AACo Cir.Ct.) - Opposition Of Plaintiffs To Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss And For Summary Judgment And Memorandum In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion For Summary Judgment And Alternative Motion For A Preliminary InjunctionHOT
On behalf of our members and in partnership with the Second Amendment Foundation and Firearms Policy Coalition, Maryland Shall Issue and three individual plaintiffs are challenging unconstitutional aspects of SB 1, the so-called “Gun Safety Act of 2023” in the US District Court for the District of Maryland. SB 1 effectively nullifies the "general right to carry in public" for carry permit holders confirmed by the Supreme Court's decision NYSRPA v. Bruen just this last June. It does so by banning firearms in a whole host of locations otherwise open to the public, including places like stores and shops, restaurants, museums, and healthcare facilities. The suit also challenges the general ban on possession of firearms on public transit owned or controlled by the State Mass Transit Administration and in the tens of thousands of acres of woodlands in State parks, State forests, and State Chesapeake forest lands. We have every confidence that we will prevail in whole or in part in this suit.