Docs - Maryland Shall Issue®, Inc. - Results from #210

Category: Public Documents

Downloads: Page 8 of 14

Start
Prev
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Next
End

Downloads: 420

MSI v. Hogan (HQL) (US Dist. Ct, MD) - Memorandum OpinionHOT

MSI v. Montgomery County (US Dist. Ct, MD) - Plaintiffs’ Corrected Reply In Support Of Plaintiffs’ Motion To Sever And To RemandHOT

MSI v. Montgomery County (US Dist. Ct, MD) - Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Sever and Remand to State CourtHOT

Lawrence v. Maryland (Court of Appeals of Maryland) - OpinionHOT

Decision from Maryland's highest court finding that ...

Hulbert v. Pope (4th Cir) - Hulberts' Opposition to Pope's Motion to Suspend BriefingHOT

MSI v. Montgomery County (US Dist. Ct, MD) - Plaintiffs' Motion to Sever and Remand to State CourtHOT

Hulbert v. Pope (4th Cir) - ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing timeHOT

Hulbert v. Pope (4th Cir.) - Defendants' MOTION to suspend briefing pending resolution of a motion for reconsideration , to extend filing time for opening brief and appendix until August 18, 2021HOT

MSI v. Montgomery County (US Dist. Ct, MD) - Defendant's Notice of Intent to file Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to DismissHOT

Hulbert v. Pope (4th Cir.) - Defendant's Response Re Suggestion of DeathHOT

MSI v. Montgomery County (US Dist. Ct, MD) - Notice of RemovalHOT

Opinion in Walker v. Donahoe (4th Cir)HOT

3-judge panel decision upholding the stop of an individual in West Virginia who was legally openly carrying an AR15 rifle while walking.

Hulbert v Pope (4th Cir) - Order Granting Motion to Substitute PartyHOT

Hulbert v Pope (4th Cir) - Appellees' Response to Suggestion of DeathHOT

Hulbert v. Pope (4th Cir) - Appellees' Motion to Substitute PartyHOT

Hulbert v. Pope (4th Cir) - Appellant's Amended Suggestion of DeathHOT

Hulbert v. Pope (4th Cir) - Briefing OrderHOT

En Banc Opinion in Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Dept (4th Cir)HOT

A case of interest. Finding that Baltimore's use of a surveillance plane violates the 4th Amendment.

MSI v. Montgomery County - Emergency Motion for Partial Summary JudgmentHOT

MSI v. Montgomery County - Memorandum in Support of Emergency Motion for Partial Summary JudgmentHOT

MSI v. Montgomery County - ComplaintHOT

Call v Jones - Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (4th Cir)HOT

Hulbert v Pope - ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion for Summary JudgmentHOT

United States District Court for the District Court of Maryland Case# 1:18-cv-00461

Hulbert v Pope - Memorandum OpinionHOT

United States District Court for the District Court of Maryland Case# 1:18-cv-00461

HQL Suit - Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Exhibit 28HOT

HQL Suit - Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Exhibit 22HOT

HQL Suit - Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary JudgmentHOT

Reply Brief For Petitioners - MSI v Hogan (SB707 Rapid Fire Trigger Activators)HOT

Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari - MSI v Hogan (SB707 Rapid Fire Trigger Activators)HOT

GOA v Garland 6CA OpinionHOT

Start
Prev
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Next
End

Powered by jDownloads

Latest News

August 2023 Legal Update

Novotny v. Moore - Challenge against aspects of SB 1 and current public carry restrictions

Maryland Shall Issue, the Second Amendment Foundation, the Firearms Policy Coalition, and three individuals have challenged SB 1. That bill passed this last Session of the General Assembly places many unconstitutional restrictions on the right to carry with a permit in Maryland. The case is styled Novotny v. Moore and has been consolidated with Kipke v. Moore in federal district court in Baltimore. Kipke was brought by the Maryland State Rifle and Pistol Association. Plaintiffs in both cases have filed motions for preliminary injunctions and motions for summary judgment with the aim of stopping enforcement of certain restrictions placed by SB 1 by October 1st, the bill’s effective date. Briefing is ongoing in both cases and then the court will decide whether to hold an oral argument and simply move to the issuance of a decision. The court is not required to decide the case within any set time. We will provide updates of importance as they occur. Find all of the filings in both of these cases HERE.

Contact Info

Mailing Address:

Maryland Shall Issue®, Inc.
9613 Harford Rd
Ste C #1015
Baltimore, MD 21234-2150

NOTE: Because we are an all-volunteer organization, we monitor phone messages but can not always return your call. Please send us an email at the below email address for a better chance at a response.

Phone: 410-849-9197
Email:
Web: www.marylandshallissue.org