MSI has moved for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction against aspects of Bill 21-22E.
On 11/28/2022, Montgomery County Executive Marc Elrich
signed Bill 21-22E
into law. The Bill goes into effect immediately. The Bill has now banned the possession, transport, sale or transfer of any firearm in countless locations across Maryland's most populous county. It is now legally very risky to carry a firearm in Montgomery County with a wear and carry permit
. Bill 21-22E repealed the prior exemption for permit holders and then imposes its bans on a long list of locations, including within 100 yards of such locations. It is simply impossible, as a practical matter, to possess and transport a firearm in the County in public with a wear and carry permit in compliance with the County's gun laws. That is because it is nearly impossible to move around the County without entering one or more of the many 100-yard exclusion zones enacted by Bill 21-22E.
Literally, the entire urban area and many areas in the rural segments of Montgomery County are now off-limits for carry by permit holders, including Interstate 495 and Interstate 270 and Route 355 as well as the other major roads, highways and countless neighborhoods in the County. With the enactment of Bill 21-22E, carrying with a permit in the County will expose the permit holder to arrest and prosecution not only under County law (6 months imprisonment and a fine) but also to arrest and prosecution under MD Code, Public Safety, § 4-203(a), a violation of which is punishable by up to three years imprisonment and a fine. That is because the permit is not valid where firearms are prohibited by law (check the back of the permit). A conviction under Section 4-203(a) creates a lifetime disqualification from the possession of a firearm or ammunition under both federal and state law.
The day after Bill 21-22E went into effect, MSI responded to the bill's enactment by amending its existing lawsuit against the County
in federal district court. Though the County Executive and Council may believe and pretend otherwise, Marylanders have a right to carry firearms for their personal defense in public. We have moved quickly to urge the Court to resolve the matter on an emergency basis by asking for leave to file a motion for an emergency TRO and preliminary injunction. Once leave is granted, that motion will be filed and, we hope, adjudicated expeditiously. Stay tuned. Maryland Shall Issue Inc., et al v. Montgomery County
Second Amended Complaint: https://bit.ly/3FdJZkI
Notice of Intent to Submit a Motion for a TRO and Preliminary Injunction: https://bit.ly/3EQy3UT
With the bill
's signature, it is now criminal
to possess, sell, transfer, transport, or carry a firearm, with or without a carry permit
, in or within 100 yards
of any publicly or privately
- place of worship
- recreational facility
- community health center, including any health care facility or community-based program licensed by the Maryland Department of Health
- long-term facility, including any licensed nursing home, group home, or care home
- multipurpose exhibition facility, such as a fairgrounds or conference center
- childcare facility
Bill 21-22E also criminalize firearms possession, transport, sale or transfer by any person (including permit holders) at or within 100 yards of a:
- government building, including any place owned by or under the control of the County
- polling place
- legislative assembly, and
- a gathering of individuals to collectively express their constitutional right to protest or assemble
This includes "all property associated with the place, such as a parking lot or grounds of a building." Essentially, roughly a football field's distance extends in every direction from all of these places and their grounds.
The exceptions are narrow. The [brackets] indicate where language exempting permit holders was removed by Bill 21-22E:
The bill also amended the County's ordinance concerning privately made firearms, in an (unsuccessful) attempt to make the County's existing ban on such firearms consistent with state and federal law concerning privately made firearms (which the County insists on mischaracterizing as "ghost guns"). Bill 21-22E squarely violates the Second Amendment in multiple ways under the Supreme Court's decision in Bruen
and conflicts with State and federal laws governing privately owned firearms.Stay tuned for further developments.MSI cannot take on any of these challenges without your support. Don't be a free rider. Join or donate to MSI today.